Editorial policies

Funding

Análisis Filosófico does not charge authors article processing charges (APCs), nor does it charge any reader for access to the published material.  The Argentine Society of Philosophical Analysis (SADAF) undertakes the full cost of editing and publishing the articles.

Open access

Análisis Filosófico honours policies of open access to science research because it deems that both scientific publications and research work subsidized by public resources should circulate freely, with no restrictions, and promotes the diamond open access model. 

All the contents of this journal, unless otherwise specified, are under Creative Commons License Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) whereby authors retain their authorship rights and other people are allowed to copy and distribute their work as long as they acknowledge authorship and the work is not used for commercial purposes.

Following the recommendations of the Budapest Open Access Initiative and its updates BOAI10 and BOAI20, the content is freely available on the public Internet and any user can read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of the articles, crawl them for indexing, incorporate them as data in software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal or technical barriers other than those inseparable from Internet access itself.

As a signatory of the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), SADAF adheres to its recommendations on eliminating journal-based metrics in funding, appointment and promotion considerations for researchers, on the need to assess research on its own merits, and on making use of online publication to explore new indicators of significance and impact.

Análisis Filosófico is committed to the principles of the Manifesto on Science as a Global Public Good - Non-Commercial Open Access: 1) Universal right, 2) Equity, diversity and multilingualism, 3) Ownership by the academy and heritage of humanity, 4) Recognition and valuation, and 5) Collaboration.

Análisis Filosófico is committed to the values and principles set out in the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science, adopted at the 41st General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 2021.

Research ethics and open data

Análisis Filosófico is committed to the CONICET Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Social Sciences and Humanities. It also recommends that its authors deposit their research data (for example, translations, annotations, structured bibliographies, etc.) in open access digital data repositories, in compliance with Argentine Law 26,899 on Digital Repositories and following the recommendation of CAICYT: "The availability of the research data used in articles in open access repositories, following registration standards that ensure the authorship, use and citation of the data as well as of the corresponding article, contributes to the replicability of research and increases the visibility and citations of research and of journals."

Preprints

Análisis Filosófico accepts manuscripts previously deposited in trusted preprint servers, since posting on such servers is not considered prior publication; it may likewise make use of them, or allow authors to use them, until the time of publication. Authors must declare the existence of the preprint at the time of submission and indicate its DOI or corresponding link, and must ensure that the preprint clearly states that it has not undergone peer review.

Self-archiving

Análisis Filosófico does not withhold rights of reproduction or copyright.  Consequently, authors may use the final versions of publications in order to share them in institutional repositories, personal blogs or any other electronic media.

Authors who publish research funded with public funds of the Argentine Republic are reminded that, in compliance with Law 26,899 on Open Access Institutional Digital Repositories, they must deposit a copy of the final version of their work in the open access digital repositories of their institutions within no more than six months from the date of publication.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate the final published version of their work (e.g. on institutional or personal websites, thematic or institutional repositories, social networks, etc.), mentioning the persistent article identifier (DOI) as it may lead to productive exchanges as well as to a higher citation of the published work.

Digital preservation 

Análisis Filosófico guarantees permanent and secure archiving via LOCKSS, an open source program developed by the Library at Stanford University. It guarantees regular conservation of the contents of registered journals in order to compile and archive recently published material. Likewise, if Análisis Filosófico ceases publication, the archive will be preserved on SCIELO (http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1851-9636),  REDALYC (http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=3400) and Dialnet (https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/revista?codigo=27995).

Metadata

Análisis Filosófico guarantees the use of the OAI-PMH (Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting) interoperability protocol for the exchange of information among different systems, which allows portals and specialized search engines to harvest the metadata of the digital objects held in repositories. In order to preserve the consistency and standardization of metadata in the description of digital documents, the journal reserves the right to edit such metadata in order to adopt best
practices in content description.

Análisis Filosófico provides a persistent identifier (DOI) for all published material and recommends that its authors use the ORCID identifier.

Use of AI 

AI is a tool, and authorship is attributable exclusively to the human being who uses it and signs as the author of the work submitted. No AI can be considered the author or co-author of works submitted to Análisis Filosófico.

When submitting their work, authors must declare in the journal's OJS system any use of AI in the writing process, indicating the tool used and the task performed (preparation of abstract or bibliography, writing, bibliographic search, translation, etc.).

Authors are fully responsible for the accuracy, integrity, originality, and validity of all content in their work, including parts generated or assisted by AI.

It is the author's responsibility to carefully review and edit the results generated by AI for possible inaccuracies, incompleteness, bias, distortions, irrelevancies, misrepresentations, or plagiarism.

The use of AI for image generation is strictly prohibited.

Análisis Filosófico asks its external reviewers not to enter the whole or any part of the text under evaluation into any AI tool, in order to guarantee the confidentiality of the manuscript; likewise, if they use AI tools to prepare their report, it asks that such use be declared.

Análisis Filosófico adheres to the criteria for the use and application of AI tools in scientific publishing proposed by the Heredia Declaration, COPE and WAME, and adopted in the Decalogue produced by the Argentine Center for Scientific and Technical Information (CAICYT-CONICET).

Gender equality

Análisis Filosófico is committed to ensuring that women make up 50% of the composition of its editorial board (measuring all of its bodies together) and to trying to reach, as far as possible, a minimum of 40% women among the reviewers of the papers submitted to the journal.

The journal includes the full names of the authors of the works it publishes.

Publication languages and appropriate language

Análisis Filosófico publishes in Spanish, Portuguese and English, under the precept of safeguarding linguistic diversity, and the choice of the language of writing is left to the author. It also publishes the English translation of the title, subtitle, abstract and keywords of articles and critical notes in order to promote their indexing and international visibility.

Análisis Filosófico will not admit the use of offensive language or language laden with prejudice associated with race, disability or functional diversity, gender, sexual orientation, beliefs, ideology or socioeconomic status. The use of non-sexist language is left to the author's discretion, and the journal neither recommends nor rejects its use.